Morse Code keyers are everywhere these days - most new transceivers come with built-in keyers. So why isn't sending CW on them much fun? Have you
considered that maybe it's not the paddle, nor the operator, but instead
that built-in keyer that is making your CW tranmission more work than
pleasure?
So why isn't that built in keyer more user friendly? Why? Because it was
almost surely designed by a software engineer who is likely not a ham,
and even more likely someone who never has made a CW QSO in his life.
Not only that, but the keyer exists purely in the transceiver software.
All modern transceivers have their various functions managed by a built
in central computer - the CPU. Everything is controlled by that CPU -
tuning, frequency synthesization, bfo, second VFO, filter selection, the
works. The CPU must also fulfill the keyer duties as well.
Modern transceivers do not use dedicated circuitry for keyers - instead
they multi-task the CPU. But whereas touching your paddle should be the
first step in initiating the sending of a CW dot or dash, as far as the
CPU is concerned it is one of the very last. The CPU monitors your
paddle for a dot or dash closure - AFTER it has taken care of all the
other things it needs to do to keep your transceiver running.
Considering these handicaps, is it any wonder that transceiver "keyers"
are not particularly user friendly?
QSK operation, desired by many CW operators, is a feature of most new
transceivers. However, almost without exception, dots and dashes are
truncated by the QSK timing circuitry, so your outgoing CW sounds very
light in weight at the other end. And even if correction is restored,
the transceiver should be able to correct for further timing distortion
truncation introduced by your linear. Does your transceiver do this?
Where is the control?
A dedicated outboard CW keyer could offer many advantages. For one
thing, it would not have to share CPU time with other functions. It
could be designed by people who are dedicated CW operators, who
understand what a keyer truly should be. It could manage your QSK timing
so your CW signal is perfect. It would offer a lot of other features
lacking in the transceiver keyers that would make your CW operating a
pleasure.
A major advantage of the outboard dedicated keyer comes when you change
rigs. The new shiny transceiver will of course have the mandatory
built-in-software keyer, just like the old one did. But guess what? The
new keyer is just about guaranteed to be different from that in the
earlier rig, even if both rigs came from the same manufacturer. The
paddle timing is different, the "feel" is different. You say you liked
the "feel" of the old rig better? Tough.
Clearly, an outboard keyer won't have that problem if you like the
outboard keyer's "feel", timing and features, you know it will pick
right up with the new rig, just as it did with the old.
About Transceivers with 'Built-in' Keyers
What would make the perfect stand-alone CW keyer?
Logikey K-5 Keyer - Assembled & Tested
Super CMOS3 Keyer - Partial Kit
Logikit CMOS4 Keyer - Complete Kit or Assembled & Tested
Keyer Documentation
Home Page
© 1999-2002 Idiom Press. All Rights Reserved.
Web Design and Hosting by QTH.COM